Blog

Articles, Historical Romance

Joel Fry Joins Sarah Snook in Jane Austen Adaptation ‘Persuasion’ (Exclusive) (Press This!) Hollywood Reporter

British actor Joel Fry, who appeared in Danny Boyle’s Yesterday, has joined Succession’s Sarah Snook to star in Persuasion, an adaptation of Jane Austen’s final novel that Mahalia Belo is directing for Searchlight.

Source: Joel Fry Joins Sarah Snook in Jane Austen Adaptation ‘Persuasion’ (Exclusive) | Hollywood Reporter

Another version of Jane Austen’s Persuasion is coming our way. I loved the TV Movie from 2007 with yummy Rupert Penry-Jones as Captain Wentworth, but wasn’t as thrilled with their choice of Sally Hawkins as Anne. The question now is will Joel Fry be able to gain the hearts of the ladies as the Captain, while Sarah Snook may be a better choice for Anne?

2007 Persuasion

Of course, I never thought that Johnny Flynn in the 2020 version of Emma could hold a candle to Jeremy Northam in the 1996 version, but was pleasantly surprised at how touched I was with his performance. Perhaps the cravat will help to make Joel Fry appealing in the role.

Good news for Jane Austen lovers as another historical romance from the best comes to the big screen. We can only hope it does the story justice.

Articles, Historical Romance

‘Bridgerton’ author explains why Shonda Rhimes adapted her books (Press This! Insider)

Julia Quinn, the author of “Bridgerton,” said the offer to turn her best-selling romance series into a Netflix show came unexpectedly.”The way I understand it, Shonda ran out of books to read on vacation and somehow stumbled on one of mine,” Quinn said during a recent appearance on “Tamron Hall.””It’s crazy to think that my life is forever changed because Shonda didn’t bring enough reading material on vacation, but that’s honestly what happened,” Quinn added.

Source: ‘Bridgerton’ author explains why Shonda Rhimes adapted her books – Insider

Articles, Historical Romance, Press This

Sales of Bridgerton Novels Have Exploded Since Netflix Premiere (Press This! PEOPLE.com)

Almost one month after the hit period drama Bridgerton was released on Netflix, sales of the same-titled book series by Julia Quinn have exploded, with the first book securing the number one spot on The New York Times’ bestsellers list. Other novels in the historical romance series aren’t far behind.

Source: Sales of Bridgerton Novels Have Exploded Since Netflix Premiere | PEOPLE.com

Congratulations, Julia Quinn!

Articles, Historical Romance, Press This

Revolutionising Romance Adaptations – (Press This! Palatinate)

The continuing conversation that the Netflix series is going to give a resurgence to the historical romance genre and hopefully give it more credit than it has received in the past.

Bridgerton quickly became more than just an adaptation; it was also a challenge to destigmatize a genre that doesn’t wholly deserve the condemnation it’s received.

Source: Revolutionising romance adaptations – Palatinate

Articles, New Releases, Press This

Bridgerton Renewed For Season 2, Filming Starts This Spring (Press This! Screen Rant)

Hold onto your bonnets ladies, Anthony Bridgerton’s story in The Viscount Who Loved Me is coming to screen next.

1814 promises to be another eventful season, but not, This Author believes, for Anthony Bridgerton, London’s most elusive bachelor, who has shown no indication that he plans to marry. And in all truth, why should he? When it comes to playing the consummate rake, nobody does it better…                          –Lady Whistledown’s Society Papers, April 1814

Season 2 will focus on Anthony Bridgerton. Bridgerton has officially been renewed for a second season at Netflix, which will begin filming this spring. The historical romance saga, based on Julia Quinn’s popular series of novels, became an instant classic for the streamer when season 1 released in December of 2020. Now, fans can look forward to more romance, secrets, marriages and affairs coming soon.

Source: Bridgerton Renewed For Season 2, Filming Starts This Spring

Articles, Historical Romance, Press This

‘Bridgerton’ Isn’t Bad Austen — It’s An Entirely Different Genre (Press This! HuffPost)

Now this article gets it right about what historical romance is all about. Great article and worth the read!

“By building a love story between the primary couple, one that is guaranteed to end ‘happily ever after’ or ‘happy for now,’ a romance novel not only provides escapism and the heart-pounding rush of vicarious passion, but a space in which to explore how romantic relationships can and should be, and how women can find fulfillment and happiness. And that means these stories have little to do with how the marriage market of Regency high society actually functioned; they’re about what readers — predominantly women — want to see in their lives today.”

Source: ‘Bridgerton’ Isn’t Bad Austen — It’s An Entirely Different Genre | HuffPost

Articles, Historical Romance, Press This

‘Bridgerton’ Isn’t As Sex Positive As It Thinks (Press This! IndieWire)

This article on IndieWire is a bit harsh, calling Bridgerton’s storyline as “perpetrating harmful myths” (I’m not too keen on the word choice).  So let’s back-up the carriage here, folks.  He’s not just talking about the series, but he’s criticizing the premise of Julia Quinn’s historical romance novel, and undoubtedly thousands of other books by other authors.

Apparently, due to the so-called lack of “practical sex education in this country,” the information expressed in this series paints a “dismal” portrait.  It gives the idea that sex is “wildly passionate” and everlasting love is the norm (those darn romance books with HEA).  I doubt readers believe that the Duke & I is a sex education manual. 

The writer of this article definitely doesn’t understand the historical romance genre, or why readers enjoy reading the fantasy of wild sexual encounters and happily ever after.  Readers already know the reality of sex and love and turn to books and period dramas such as Bridgerton to escape for a few hours.  I  sincerely doubt that Bridgerton is being used as sex education by women who never had organisms, or youth experiencing their first sexual encounter.  The writer also points out only 64 percent of women have organisms during intercourse and criticizes Daphne’s experience of fantasying about her first with Simon. Tsk. Tsk.

I guess I’m as guilty as any other author that I perpetuate (a better choice of words) myths of sexual pleasure and happy ever after scenarios.  What is to be done with us?  I know — keep writing and keep reading.

It’s unfortunate, however, that Daphne’s sexual awakening arrives entirely at the hands of Simon, a man. It may be progressive for the Regency era, but it’s condescending and coddling to today’s women and girls.

Source: ‘Bridgerton’ Isn’t As Sex Positive As It Thinks | IndieWire

Historical Romance, Press This, Regency Romance

Why Are So Many Romances Set in the Regency Period? (Press This! JSTOR Daily)

Romance is one of the most lucrative fiction genres, a billion-dollar industry featuring stories full of banter, courtship, and smoldering chemistry.  So how did an entire subgenre of literature spring up around a few thousand rich people who lived during the 1810s?

Source: Why Are So Many Romances Set in the Regency Period? | JSTOR Daily

Historical Romance, Press This

Bridgerton Glossary (Press This! Oprah Magazine)

Fans of historical romance are versed in the Regency language. It never occurred to me that since Bridgerton seen by the general public on Netflix would need definitions. This article defines terms such as promenade, facer, Ton, courses, with child, sire an heir, swoon, snuff, modiste, countenance, rake, duke, viscount, a diamond of the first water, and the dark walk. I hate to think the public doesn’t know the meaning of some of these words, but nonetheless, one must educate the masses.

Two romance novelists break down the show’s historical terms.  There was just one problem. Watching the drama, which is set in 1813 London, occasionally felt like translating a foreign language. From talk of the “ton” to notorious “rakes,” I was often confused by the characters’ Regency speak. But apparently if I read romance novels, I might not have mistaken a rake for a gardening tool instead of a man.

Source: Bridgerton Glossary – A Guide to Words Like Rake, Ton, Promenade

Articles, Historical Romance, Industry News

Netflix’s ‘Bridgerton’ Heats Up Romance Genre – (Press This! WSJ)

A show based on popular bodice-rippers gives an industry often dismissed as tawdry a much-needed embrace. The success of “Bridgerton” couldn’t have come at a better time for the romance industry, which has been struggling to retain its power in the publishing world. Recent years have marked a steady decline in print and ebook sales of romance novels, which went from more than 98 million units sold in 2012 to 41 million in 2020, according to NPD BookScan, whose figures do not reflect sales of self-published titles.

Source: Netflix’s ‘Bridgerton’ Heats Up Romance – WSJ

Historical Romance, Industry News, Press This

Duchess of York: From Budgie the Helicopter to Mills & Boon (Press This! BBC News)

Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York, has written her first novel for adults, to be released by the leading romantic fiction publisher Mills & Boon.  Her novel Heart for a Compass is a fictional historical saga inspired by her great-great-aunt.

Source: Duchess of York: From Budgie the Helicopter to Mills & Boon

Articles, Historical Romance, Press This

10 Books Like ‘Bridgerton’ To Read When You Need More Romance (Press This! Elite Daily)

Author Julia Quinn’s Bridgerton series of novels is as delightful as the hit Netflix show adapted from it. Luckily, many viewers getting into the world of Bridgerton means quite a few new readers will head to their libraries or local bookstores to check out the books that inspired the show.

Source: 10 Books Like ‘Bridgerton’ To Read When You Need More Romance

Articles, Historical Romance, Historical Romance Genre, Press This

Blame Jane: Romance Novels 2019–2020 (Press This! Publishers Weekly)

What’s so great about Regency romances anyway?

Source: Blame Jane: Romance Novels 2019–2020

Another interesting article – Blame Jane! “The lack of realistic options for writing interesting heroines is where the Regency loses a lot of authors. The choice can feel stuck between anachronism—planting a modern sensibility into an historic setting—and gender politics that leave modern readers cold.”

Articles, Historical Romance, Press This

Bridgerton’s Toxic Romance Fails Its Audience (Press This! Screen Rant)

The article linked below makes the point, “The Duke and I, was first published in 2000 – twenty years ago, well before woke culture, the #MeToo movement, and our growing understanding of consent and healthy gender dynamics.” We are back again to the conundrum that historical romance needs to stay pure to the times in which women lived, or we need to tweak the past so that it doesn’t offend those in the present.

Recently I read a review for the Earl’s Well that Ends Well, a new release by Catherine Heloise, on another book website. I won’t go into the review itself but would like to focus upon a comment left by a reader. Perhaps it brings up a singular thought or one that is currently running through the historical romance genre as readers deal with the past versus the present. Can readers find enjoyment in love stories that deal with toxic relationships and time periods that were oppressive to women? On the other hand, are more progressive readers going to demand that authors write novels in tune with today’s social expectations?

It’s an interesting argument that I think is going to split the genre going forward. There will be readers who want historical norms with romance, and others who want a modern romance version set in a historical setting. I think there can definitely be a blend of strong heroines in books going forward as discussed in a previous post, “Changing Heroines in Historical Romance.” All you have to do nowadays is read book reviews and focus on the five and one-star comments. The split of opinions on the subject is growing.

Talk to me! Do you mind reading about “toxic” relationships? Of course, characters should have flaws and the healing of couples can bring two together into healthy relationships. Do the oppressive eras that women dealt with rub you the wrong way, or are you able to handle it if the female character has a bit of spunk?

The problem with Bridgerton is not in how it portrays society but in how it portrays the relationship between Daphne and Simon. Beneath the veneer of romance, it’s a mutually manipulative and toxic relationship and one that shouldn’t be emulated. Unfortunately, it’s this sort of relationship that Bridgerton chooses to center, and in doing so, the show fails its modern audience.

Source: Bridgerton’s Toxic Romance Fails Its Audience | Screen Rant

Articles, Historical Romance

True Story of Lady Whistledown’s Scandal Sheets in ‘Bridgerton’ (Press This! Town & Country

A history lesson on the gossip columns. Great read.

“Newspapers were plentiful during the Regency Era, with most of the stories published centering on politics, crime, fashion, infidelity, or royal doings,” says Geri Walton, author of Marie Antoinette’s Confidante and regular writer on 18th and 19th-century Europe.

Source: True Story of Lady Whistledown’s Scandal Sheets in ‘Bridgerton’