Historical Romance

Farewell to the Bodice Ripper: The Slow Death of the Mass-Market Paperback

Remember when historical romance novels were small enough to fit in your purse—and sometimes scandalous enough that you wanted to keep them there?

There was a time when a woman could walk into her neighborhood grocery store, drugstore, or bookstore and find an entire revolving rack or shelf devoted to historical romance novels. For a few dollars, she could escape into Regency England, the Scottish Highlands, or the ballrooms of Victorian London.

They were inexpensive, portable, and often adorned with some of the most outrageous cover art ever conceived by the publishing industry. Muscular heroes with flowing hair embraced beautiful heroines whose gowns appeared to be in imminent danger of falling off. Of course, respectable women had a solution for those rather embarrassing covers. We tucked the books discreetly into our purses, where no one could see what we were reading. Never mind that the corner of a bare-chested Scottish Highlander might be sticking out beside our lipstick and car keys. Those were the days.

Unfortunately, the mass-market paperback, once the undisputed queen of popular fiction, is rapidly disappearing from American bookshelves. And for historical romance readers, its demise represents the end of a remarkable publishing era.

The Little Books That Built Historical Romance

The modern historical romance boom owes much of its success to the humble mass-market paperback. During the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, publishers such as Avon, Zebra, Signet, Dell, Berkley, and Harlequin filled bookstores with affordable romantic adventures.

Authors such as Kathleen E. Woodiwiss, Rosemary Rogers, Johanna Lindsey, Judith McNaught, and countless others became household names among romance readers. Later generations discovered Lisa Kleypas, Julia Quinn, Mary Balogh, and other beloved historical romance authors through those same conveniently sized books.

Unlike today’s larger trade paperbacks, mass-market editions generally measured approximately 4¼ by 7 inches. They could be carried almost anywhere, stuffed into a coat pocket, slipped into a handbag, or concealed behind a more respectable-looking publication.

They were also affordable. For readers who consumed three or four romances a week, price mattered. A woman could purchase several books without feeling she had made a significant investment.

And there was something particularly satisfying about finishing one historical romance and immediately reaching for another. No charging cables. No subscriptions. No software updates.

Just another duke, another scandal, and another happily-ever-after.

The Numbers Tell a Rather Sad Story

According to Circana BookScan figures reported by Publishers Weekly in December 2025, sales of mass-market paperbacks have collapsed over the past two decades.

YearU.S. Mass-Market Paperback Unit Sales
2004131 million
202421 million
2025, through OctoberApproximately 15 million

Between 2004 and 2024, sales declined by approximately 84 percent. These figures cover mass-market paperbacks across genres, not historical romance alone. Nevertheless, romance was one of the formats’ most important markets. The numbers are staggering when one considers how many millions of readers once depended on these inexpensive editions.

The decline has been attributed to several factors, including the popularity of e-books, rising printing and distribution costs, shrinking retail space, and publishers’ increasing preference for larger, more profitable trade paperbacks.

A trade paperback might sell for $16 to $20 or more, while the traditional mass-market paperback generally occupied a much lower price range. For publishers and retailers, the economics are understandable. For readers, however, paying nearly twice as much for a printed romance is hardly an attractive proposition.

The Announcement That May Have Sealed Their Fate

One of the most consequential developments came when ReaderLink, a major American book distributor, announced that it would discontinue distributing mass-market paperbacks at the end of 2025. ReaderLink supplied books to retailers including Walmart, Kroger, Hudson News, and numerous other mass-market outlets. According to Publishers Weekly, its customers represented an estimated 60 to 70 percent of U.S. mass-market paperback sales. Consider what that means.

The familiar paperback rack at the supermarket, once an important source of romance novels, has lost much of the distribution system that kept it stocked. And when books disappear from the places where casual readers traditionally purchased them, sales become even more difficult to sustain. It is a vicious circle. Fewer books on shelves mean fewer opportunities to buy them. Fewer purchases give publishers another reason to discontinue the format.

Which Historical Romance Publishers Are Abandoning Mass-Market Paperbacks?

Several prominent publishing houses have already moved away from the format, although their plans differ.

Kensington Publishing: Once one of the largest independent publishers of mass-market paperbacks, Kensington confirmed in 2025 that it would stop publishing mass-market editions in categories including romance and thrillers. Some titles would instead appear as trade paperbacks or hardcovers. The company initially planned to retain certain niche categories, including cozy mysteries.

Berkley/Penguin Random House: Berkley has been shifting away from mass-market editions in favor of trade paperbacks. Historical romance author Anne Gracie publicly discussed her departure from Berkley after twenty years, citing the industry’s move away from the format and the increasingly difficult market for historical romance.

HarperCollins/Avon: HarperCollins has acknowledged the industry’s transition toward trade paperbacks and has been expanding their distribution. Avon, historically one of the most recognizable names in mass-market historical romance, is part of this broader publishing environment. However, that does not constitute a verified announcement that every Avon mass-market edition has been permanently discontinued.

Harlequin Historical: Perhaps the most heartbreaking announcement for devoted historical romance readers came in February 2026. Harlequin confirmed that its long-running Harlequin Historical series will end in September 2027, after nearly forty years of publication. The series began in 1988 and became a familiar source of Regency, Victorian, and other period romances. Harlequin attributed the decision to changing reader interests around the world. Importantly, Harlequin is not abandoning romance publishing altogether. Other Harlequin lines will continue. Nevertheless, the disappearance of a dedicated historical romance series is a significant loss.

These developments suggest that the traditional mass-market historical romance paperback is approaching the end of its commercial life, even if some remaining editions and specialized programs survive.

What Will Barnes & Noble Put on Its Shelves?

That raises an interesting question. If mass-market paperbacks disappear, what will happen to all that bookstore shelf space? Barnes & Noble has already been adjusting. In March 2025, CEO James Daunt told Publishers Weekly that sections featuring new mass-market paperbacks had already been removed or reduced in approximately one-third of the chain’s stores.

Rather than replacing every small paperback with another book of identical dimensions, bookstores are increasingly emphasizing trade paperbacks, hardcovers, special editions, and other formats.

The romance section itself is not necessarily disappearing. Indeed, contemporary romance, romantasy, and visually appealing trade paperback editions have become prominent parts of bookstore merchandising. But there is a difference between a bookstore offering romance novels and a bookstore offering affordable historical romance novels. A reader who once walked away with three inexpensive Regency romances might now find herself contemplating the purchase of just one larger paperback. And those of us who remember shelves crowded with colorful Zebra and Avon romances cannot help wondering whether something has been lost. The old mass-market section offered enormous variety in a relatively small space. A few shelves could hold dozens upon dozens of titles.

Larger trade editions simply cannot replicate that density.

Where Can Readers Find Those Wonderful Old Paperbacks?

Fortunately, the demise of new mass-market publishing does not mean that the books themselves have vanished. Millions of copies remain in circulation, and readers willing to do a little treasure hunting can still find them.

eBay: One of the most entertaining places to search for vintage historical romances. Sellers frequently offer individual titles, author collections, and bulk lots of assorted paperbacks. Try searching for phrases such as “vintage historical romance lot,” “Zebra Regency romance books,” or “box of historical romance paperbacks.” Just watch the shipping charges.

Goodwill and other thrift stores: There is still something wonderful about discovering a forgotten historical romance tucked between a cookbook and an outdated computer manual. Selection varies enormously, but the prices can make the search worthwhile.

ThriftBooks: An online source for used and older titles, particularly when searching for specific authors or books missing from a collection.

Better World Books: Another worthwhile place to investigate when looking for secondhand editions.

PangoBooks: A secondhand book marketplace where individual readers sell books from their personal collections, sometimes including older romances and complete series.

Used bookstores, library sales, and estate sales: These may be the best places to uncover entire collections. Romance readers were often prolific buyers, and decades of accumulated paperbacks sometimes find their way into estate sales or donated-book inventories.

For serious collectors, sites such as AbeBooks and Biblio may also be useful when hunting for particular editions or memorable cover artwork.

And don’t overlook local community book sales. Somewhere, perhaps in a cardboard box beneath a folding table, a handsome duke from 1987 is still waiting to be discovered.

What about you? Do you still have a collection of old mass-market historical romances? Do you search thrift stores and eBay for favorite authors? Or have you made the transition to e-books and larger trade paperbacks?

I’d love to hear whether you miss those little books as much as I do.

Book cover reading “AI Generated: A Novel,” “A Historical Romance Novel,” and “By Eleanor Croft”
Historical Romance

AI Generated Historical Romance Publishers

The world of Historical Romance has long relied on well-worn tropes—brooding dukes, rebellious debutantes, and forbidden ballrooms. However, a new trend has surfaced in online digital publishing: AI-generated publishing entities pump out dozens of novels a month under fictional author pseudonyms to capitalize on algorithms like Amazon’s Kindle Unlimited.

There are prominent publishing names that readers and authors frequently point to in discussions surrounding AI-generated historical romance. Here is a dive into what these entities represent, how they operate, and what their presence means for the romance genre.

The Machine in the Ballroom: AI Romance Mills

The rise of generative AI tools (large language models) has drastically lowered the barrier to producing full-length books. In fast-moving, high-demand subgenres like Regency and Scottish Highlander romance, reader appetites are nearly insatiable.

Enter “content farms” masquerading as independent digital publishing houses. These operations leverage AI tools to:

  1. Generate plot outlines and text rapidly.
  2. Design AI-generated book covers featuring airbrushed, hyper-realistic historical characters.
  3. Attach pseudonyms (“authors”) with generated headshots or copied bios.
  4. Publish in volume onto platform ecosystems like Amazon’s Kindle Unlimited, where readers pay per page read.

Why Is This Happening in Historical Romance?

Historical romance is uniquely vulnerable to AI-generated publishing for three main reasons:

  1. High Reader Consumption: Romance readers read fast. Many subscribers burn through a book a day on subscription services, creating huge demand that traditional writing speeds struggle to match.
  2. Formulaic Tropes: Historical romance relies heavily on clear, structured beats (enemies-to-lovers, fake engagements, marriage of convenience). AI models excel at regurgitating formulaic patterns—even if they lack soul or historical precision.
  3. Subscription Algorithms: Digital library algorithms reward frequent publishing and high page counts. Releasing 10 machine-assisted books a month yields vastly more visibility than a human author releasing one book a year.

How Readers Can Spot AI-Generated Romance

If you want to ensure your reading time (and subscription dollars) support human creators, watch out for these red flags:

  • Incredible Release Velocity: If an author who just debuted has released 8 full-length novels in six months, it is almost certainly AI-assisted or ghostwritten by a content farm.
  • Cover Artifacts: Look closely at hair, hands, jewellery, and fabrics on covers. AI covers often feature hyper-smooth skin, blended hair strands, or historically inaccurate clothing choices.
  • Recycled Diction & Hallucinations: AI text tends to repeat specific phrasing (“a ghost of a smile,” “clenched jaw”) or misapply historical etiquette—such as calling a Duke “Mr. Hastings”.
  • Vague Author Bios: Author pages with generic, photo-stock profile pictures and identical bio structures across multiple pen names.

The Takeaway

To slow down the process of flooding the marketplace even more, Amazon changed its rules and now limits title creation on Kindle Direct Publishing (KDP) to two (2) new titles per book format each week. The restrictions are an attempt to protect readers from the influx of AI-generated books.

These AI publishing houses reflect a broader shift in digital publishing, one where algorithmic volume competes directly with creative craft. While machine-generated content may satisfy a quick reading fix for some, it often lacks the emotional nuance, sharp banter, and researched historical accuracy that make the romance genre so beloved.

To preserve the genuine warmth and depth of historical romance, we need to stay informed and champion real human storytellers. While established authors from major publishing houses are a safe bet, be mindful when exploring unfamiliar indie releases. Take a look at the publisher information, and if it says, “Independently Published,” with some type of branded logo on the cover, it could very well be AI.

Giving five-star accolades to AI-generated books, even accidentally, signals to platforms like Amazon that machine-written content is what readers want, making it harder for heart-driven human authors to survive. The market is already flooded, and many good independent indie authors are suffering by being pushed out by these large AI-driven book farms with deep pockets for advertising their romantic fluff.

Brass compass resting on an old map beside a sealed letter and flowers
Historical Romance

Avoiding Algorithm Clutter in Historical Romance Books

If you browse the Historical Romance best-seller charts on Amazon, you will quickly notice a major dilemma: the list is flooded with books that do not actually belong in the genre. Thanks to broad keyword targeting, category blending, and algorithmic categorization, readers looking for a classic historical love story often have to sift through clean historical fiction, time-travel fantasy, and contemporary adaptations.

To help you weed through the noise and find exactly what you are looking for, here is a guide to identifying true historical romance amidst the algorithmic clutter.


🕵️‍♂️ The Core Pillars of True Historical Romance

To separate true historical romance (HR) from adjacent genres, look for two non-negotiable elements that define the genre standard:

  1. The HEA or HFN Mandate: A true historical romance must center entirely on the romantic relationship and conclude with a Happily Ever After (HEA) or a Happy For Now (HFN) ending. If a book is set in 1815 but ends in tragedy, it is historical fiction, not romance. [1]
  2. The 50-Year Rule: The core community consensus relies on a specific timeline—the story must be set at least 50 years in the past from the time of publication.

❌ Common Chart-Hoppers (And How to Spot Them)

When browsing Amazon’s top charts, you will regularly encounter three specific categories that mistakenly occupy the historical romance listings:

  • Historical Fiction with a Romantic Subplot: Authors like Kristin Hannah or Danielle Steel frequently top these lists. While these novels feature sweeping historical settings and personal relationships, the primary focus is on a character’s life journey, survival, or a specific historical event rather than the romance itself.
  • Historical Fantasy and Paranormal: Stories featuring vampires in Regency London or shape-shifters in the Scottish Highlands often take up valuable space on the HR charts. While highly entertaining, true historical romance relies on the real-world constraints, etiquette, and social customs of the era rather than magical systems.
  • Classic Literature and Vintage Contemporary: Amazon frequently categorizes new editions of Jane Austen, the Brontë sisters, or early 20th-century paperbacks as historical romance. While these are foundational love stories set in the past, they were written as contemporary fiction for their time and do not follow modern romance genre beats.

🔍 Pro-Tips for Weeding Through Amazon’s Listings

To stop fighting the algorithm and start finding the right books, try adjusting your search habits with these strategies:

  • Analyze the Blurb for Genre Beats: Read the book description carefully. True romance blurbs clearly introduce both protagonists and outline the central romantic conflict. If the description focuses almost entirely on a woman running a business, solving a mystery, or surviving a war with only a brief mention of a man, it is likely historical fiction.
  • Look for Specific Tropes in Reviews: Use Amazon’s review search feature to filter for common romance terms (e.g., marriage of convenience, enemies to lovers, forced proximity, slow burn). The presence of these tropes is a strong indicator of a true genre romance.
  • Track the “Spice” Level: Historical romance varies widely, from sweet and clean Christian fiction to high-heat paperbacks. Checking consumer reviews for mentions of “heat level” or “spice” can help you determine if the book follows standard romance formatting.
  • Cross-Reference Outside of Amazon: Don’t rely solely on automated charts. Before purchasing, verify book lists on platforms like the Historical Romance Subreddit or curated genre spaces. Community-driven spaces enforce strict genre definitions that algorithms ignore.

Writing desk with books, manuscripts, photographs, lamp, map, and fabric samples
Historical Accuracy, Historical Romance

Modern Wokeness in Historical Romance: A Deep Dive

Today, we are diving into a topic that has been lighting up reader forums, Reddit threads, and author panels lately. We are talking about the rise of modern sensibilities often debated under the umbrella of “wokeness” in our favorite historical love stories.

From independent Regency wallflowers who sound like modern corporate executives to dukes who instantly champion 21st-century social justice, the genre is shifting. But is this modern lens saving the genre, or is it breaking the illusion? Let’s unpack the great debate.

The Illusion of “Historical Wallpaper”

For many readers, the joy of historical romance is the high stakes of the setting. The rigid social rules, strict class divides, and legal constraints of the past create the very friction that makes a love story so thrilling.

Lately, though, critics point out a trend of “born woke” protagonists. These are wealthy, privileged 19th-century aristocrats who possess flawless, modern, enlightened minds without ever having to work for them. When a heroine effortlessly rejects patriarchy or classism without any social consequences or internal struggle, the history fades away. The setting becomes mere “historical wallpaper,” or a pretty costume draped over a completely modern story. For a segment of the fandom, this flattening of historical reality actually lowers the dramatic stakes of the romance.

The Comfort of Revisionist History

On the flip side, why do so many readers love this shift? Romance is, at its core, about hope and emotional safety. Traditional historical romance has a dark history of glossing over or outright romanticizing eras built on colonialism, slavery, and the oppression of women.

An alternate, queer-normative, or racially diverse past allows readers to enjoy the sweeping romance, gorgeous ballgowns, and grand estates without the heavy trauma of historical bigotry. It offers a comforting space where everyone gets a happily-ever-after, regardless of the real-world history of the era.

The Problem with “Colorblind” Writing

However, attempting a completely colorblind society can sometimes backfire. Many readers of color have pointed out that ignoring the realities of history can feel like erasure.

When a book features a diverse cast but completely ignores how a family’s lavish wealth was built on overseas empires or colonization, it can create a jarring disconnect. A romance cannot magically solve systemic racism in a single generation. For many, a story that pretends these issues never existed feels blissfully ignorant rather than progressive.

Finding the Middle Ground: Authors Getting It Right

The good news? You do not have to choose between rigid, depressing accuracy and hollow, modern revisionism. A brilliant wave of authors is proving that you can write diverse, inclusive, and emotionally progressive stories that still respect the friction of the era.

If you are looking for books that balance modern emotional dynamics with authentic period constraints, add these authors to your TBR list immediately:

  • Beverly Jenkins: The undisputed queen of 19th-century African American historical romance. Her books are impeccably researched, deeply grounded in real history, and filled with breathtaking romance.
  • Alyssa Cole: Her Loyal League series features diverse protagonists navigating the immense stakes and dangers of the American Civil War.
  • Diana Quincy: Known for her Clandestine Affairs series, Quincy seamlessly weaves Arab-American heritage and cultural friction into the traditional Regency setting.
  • Scarlett Peckham & Tessa Dare: For those who love traditional settings, these authors openly engage with the hypocrisy of Regency wealth and empire while delivering the feminist themes modern readers crave.

Where do you stand on modern discourse in historical romance? Do you prefer strict historical accuracy, or do you love a progressive, escapist fantasy? Let’s chat in the comments below!

Newsletter titled “The Latest News for Historical Romance Genre,” featuring trends, releases, author updates, conventions, and awards.
Historical Romance

September 2026 Latest News – Historical Romance

The Regency & Beyond: What’s Trending in Historical Romance Right Now

If your reading pile is permanently stacked with ballgowns, yearning glances across crowded drawing-rooms, and sharp-witted protective heroes, you are in the right place. Today, we are diving into the biggest trends, themes, and highly anticipated releases shaking up the historical romance world right now.

👑 The “Austen-core” Wave is Stronger Than Ever

Jane Austen’s influence has never truly left us, but right now, it is experiencing a massive resurgence. Between upcoming screen adaptations and a wave of new print retellings, authors are leaning heavily into the classic tropes of miscommunication, societal pressures, and intense, slow-burn longing. Readers are craving that specific flavor of high-stakes etiquette mixed with undeniable chemistry.

🪄 The Rise of “Histromantasy”

One of the most exciting shifts in the genre is the blending of traditional historical settings with lush fantasy elements. Authors are increasingly weaving magic, folklore, and mythical heists into real-world eras.

A perfect example making waves right now is Sasha Peyton Smith’s upcoming release, The Fox Bride. This highly anticipated novel combines the beloved arranged-marriage trope with a magical heist and a deeply yearning hero. It’s the perfect transition read if you love the historical atmosphere but want a dash of the supernatural.

🗺️ Expanding Beyond Mayfair

While Regency London remains a comforting staple, the genre is continuing its beautiful expansion into broader historical settings. We are seeing a massive surge in:

  • Gilded Age Glamour: High society New York filled with new money, old secrets, and fierce independence.
  • Vibrant Global Settings: Richly detailed romances set in historical Asia, the Caribbean, and continental Europe, bringing fresh cultural perspectives to classic romance structures.
  • Working-Class Heroes: Moving away from dukes and earls to focus on tradespeople, investigators, and self-made magnates.

📚 Quick Reads & Fresh Releases

Looking to update your digital or physical bookshelf this week? The community is buzzing with new indie and traditional arrivals. You can check out the absolute newest book drops, community ratings, and trope tags over on the Romance.io New Releases tracker to find your exact flavor of historical escape.

Historical Romance

The Hidden Struggles in Austen’s Romantic World

Most readers think of Austen as the queen of romance, wit, and happy endings. Yet beneath her drawing rooms were very real Regency realities—maternal mortality, inherited wealth tied to slavery, unhappy marriages, financial insecurity, and emotional manipulation.

Screenwriter Andrew Davies believes these darker threads deserve more attention in modern adaptations. Some Austen fans are horrified. Others argue he is simply making visible what Austen quietly assumed her readers already understood. Andrew Davis is no stranger to Jane Austen adaptations, famous for several of Jane Austen’s works for television, most notably Pride & Prejudice (1995), Emma (1996), and Sanditon (2019).

As historical romance writers, it’s an interesting question. Should we preserve the comforting world readers expect—or should we also acknowledge the harsher realities of the era? Perhaps the best historical fiction does both: offering hope while never forgetting the history that shaped its characters.

To read more about his shocking ideas, such as Emma dying in childbirth, Frank Churchill being cruel to Jane and eventually dying, and Jane Fairfax and Mr. Knightley having a happily ever after, read more below.

READ MORE – The Times

Historical Romance
Historical Romance

Are Independent Authors Now Leading Historical Romance?

For decades, historical romance was largely shaped by traditional publishing houses. Readers wandered bookstore aisles searching for beloved imprints from Avon, Zebra, Signet, and Harlequin Historical, knowing exactly what kind of sweeping romance awaited inside those pages. The genre flourished through mass market paperbacks, established distribution channels, and the trusted names of publishing houses that became synonymous with romance itself.

But publishing has changed dramatically over the last ten years.

A growing question among readers and writers alike is whether independent authors have now become the dominant force in historical romance. While the answer depends on how success is measured, there is compelling evidence that indie authors are no longer simply participating in the genre — in many ways, they are driving it forward.

Romance, perhaps more than any other category, became the engine behind the self-publishing revolution. Kindle Unlimited and the rise of ebook readership transformed the way readers discover and consume stories. Romance readers are prolific. Many finish multiple books each week, follow favorite tropes closely, and willingly take chances on unfamiliar authors if a story promises the emotional experience they are seeking.

That environment proved ideal for independent publishing.

Unlike traditional publishing schedules that may require a year or more between releases, indie authors can write and publish quickly, remain responsive to reader demand, and cultivate direct relationships with their audiences. Readers today are often discovering books through Amazon recommendations, BookTok, Facebook groups, newsletters, and online communities rather than browsing physical bookstore shelves.

In many ways, the power structure has shifted. Readers increasingly follow authors and tropes rather than publishing imprints.

Historical romance itself has experienced notable contraction within traditional publishing. Mass market lines have diminished, bookstore shelf space has shrunk, and some publishers have reduced their historical offerings altogether in favor of contemporary romance, which currently dominates broader commercial trends.

Yet while traditional publishing has narrowed its focus, indie authors have quietly stepped into the space left behind.

Today, independent historical romance authors are thriving in subgenres and storytelling styles that may once have been considered too niche or risky by traditional standards. Readers continue searching for:

  • slow-burn Regency romance,
  • gothic historical fiction,
  • closed-door and wholesome romance,
  • family legacy sagas,
  • emotional, character-driven storytelling,
  • inheritance disputes and crumbling estates,
  • lesser-used historical periods,
  • mature heroines and heroes,
  • atmospheric romances rich with history and restraint.

Ironically, independent authors may now be preserving some of the very qualities that once defined historical romance.

That does not mean traditional publishing has disappeared or become irrelevant. Major publishers still hold enormous influence through print distribution, bookstore visibility, prestige reviews, and established bestseller networks. Traditional publication remains an important path for many authors.

However, the definition of success has evolved.

An indie author with a loyal Kindle Unlimited readership, strong newsletter following, and steady release schedule may now reach more active historical romance readers than some traditionally published authors whose books appear briefly on physical shelves before disappearing into an overcrowded marketplace.

Readers themselves have changed as well. Increasingly, they care less about who published a book and more about whether the story delivers what they love: emotional tension, unforgettable characters, satisfying romance, and immersive historical atmosphere.

The modern romance reader is highly sophisticated. They know exactly what tropes they want, what emotional tone they prefer, and what kind of storytelling keeps them turning pages late into the night.

For historical romance authors, this shift is both challenging and deeply encouraging.

It means there is still a passionate readership for stories filled with family legacies, old estates, slow-burn longing, wounded heroes, intelligent heroines, and the enduring belief that love can survive the passage of time. Those stories have not vanished simply because publishing trends have changed.

If anything, readers may now have more access to them than ever before.

The walls of traditional publishing are no longer the only gateway into the genre. Independent authors have proven that readers are still hungry for richly emotional historical fiction and romance — whether those stories arrive through New York publishing houses or directly from the writer’s own desk.

Historical Romance

Harlequin Discontinues Historical Romance Line

If you haven’t heard the news, historical romance titles published by Harlequin will reportedly no longer be available beginning sometime in September 2027. Harlequin cited “changing global market conditions” as the reason behind the decision, though it remains unclear which factors ultimately led to the move.

Perhaps reader preferences have evolved over time. While Harlequin has long been associated with cleaner, more wholesome romance stories, today’s historical romance landscape offers a wide range of styles and heat levels. Some readers gravitate toward sweeping, traditional love stories, while others prefer steamier romances featuring brooding dukes and more explicit storytelling. Historical romance has always been a broad genre, with room for many different interpretations of happily-ever-after.

Is it a loss readers should be concerned about? Probably not. Historical romance remains one of publishing’s most enduring genres, and countless publishing houses and independent authors continue to fill bookshelves with stories readers love. No doubt, you can find plenty of Harlequin books on thrift book sites and at your local Goodwill stores.

Those who will likely suffer are the authors who have repeatedly been published through Harlequin, who will have to find agents and publishers elsewhere, or go rogue as independent self-publishers.

If you’re interesting in looking what Harlequin currently has, there’s a “shelf” on Goodreads with an extensive list. CLICK HERE

In the romance publisher’s latest move to adapt its series business to the digital age, Harlequin Historical will cease publication in fall 2027 after nearly 40 years.

Source: Harlequin to Discontinue Historical Romance Line

Articles, Historical Romance

Sanditon (A Fragment of a Novel) by Jane Austen

As a huge fan of Sanditon Season 1, which originally aired on British ITV and eventually making it to PBS Masterpiece in 2019, I was thrilled to see that the cliffhanger of Season 1 would be rectified by Seasons 2 and 3.

Most viewers know, that Theo James who played Sidney Parker (also termed as the “last Austen hero”) decided not to return to the role. Whatever the conversations were behind the scenes, it was decided not to recast. As many fans bemoaned this occurrence, the producers and writers gave fans two more seasons with two more love interests for Charlotte, the heroine. How will they continue Jane Austen’s “fragment of a novel” is yet to be seen, but I have high hopes.

In anticipation of the Season 2 to be aired on March 20, 2022, I purchased Sanditon as written by Jane Austen to compare the original. Jane only finished twelve chapters in this small ninety-nine page paperback I ordered. Upon reading her last words, I was sadden by the reality of her death and how cheated her fans have been never to have known any future novels she might have written.

I also ordered Lucy Worley’s book, Jane Austen at Home. It’s a fabulous read if you want to know more about Jane’s life, her family, inspiration for her books, and where she lived. It also includes many insights into her many short-lived opportunities for matrimony with various men that did not lead to proposals, except for one which she woke up the next morning and broke. Tom Lefroy wasn’t her only love, as Hollywood would have you believe. She even encountered a man while visiting an English coastal town, much like Sanditon, who she formed affections for and he her. Unfortunately, it turned into nothing as they parted ways, and she later read he had married another. I wonder, however, had she married and born children, would she have had the time to write all the classics we now hold dear?

What did I think of Sanditon by Jane Austen? Much of it is what I term “chatty” conversation between characters, as they are introduced into the story line. It’s basically foundational with little idea of the plot, which was picked up by Andrew Davies the screenwriter who continued the unfinished novel, making it into a miniseries. As most know, it ended on a dastardly cliffhanger with Charlotte Heyword and her almost intended Sidney Parker never marrying as he sacrificed his happiness to save his brother from his incompetence. When ITV decided not to renew, the fans raised hell and launched a successful campaign to save the show. BritBoxUK and Masterpiece PBS picked it up. They have finished filming Season 2 and are currently filming Season 3. Just yesterday, they released the first promo pictures, one of which is above, that excited fans worldwide into a frenzy.

To read more, follow the link to Masterpiece and feast your eyes on what is to come. Frankly, I believe Jane Austen is leaping for joy in heaven, and not rolling over in her grave as some naysayers have insinuated. It’s a joyful, respectful, and professional tribute to her enduring stories and the book she was unable to completed.

Articles, Historical Romance, Press This

Stephen Fry on the Enduring Appeal of Georgette Heyer (Press This! The Guardian)

As the Folio Society publishes a new edition of Venetia, the actor and broadcaster reflects on what makes an excellent Regency romance. From the absolutely appalling cover art that has defaced her books since she was first published, you would think Georgette Heyer the most gooey, ghastly, cutesy, sentimental and trashy author who ever dared put pen to paper.

Source: Stephen Fry on the enduring appeal of Georgette Heyer

Articles, Historical Romance

Who Are the Frequent Best Sellers in Historical Romance?

Every day I look at the best seller list for Historical Romance on Amazon – the hopeful rank for authors. That doesn’t negate the fact that Barnes & Noble, Kobo, and iBooks have their own best seller list. Most of them contain the same books and don’t vary too much in who’s-who and what’s-what when it comes to reading. The only difference there, is that any book on Amazon’s best seller list that is enrolled in Kindle Unlimited will not be for sale on other retailer platforms.

If you study the list long enough, there are frequent publishers and authors that dominate the list on Amazon. Here’s a few of them to consider.

  • Dragonblade Publishing – This niche publishing house does nothing but historical romance and its sub-genres (time travel, historical fiction with romantic elements, historical mysteries, all with a HEA). Every month they dominate the best-selling charts, with a few authors that are consistently noted. Their covers are stunning (I know because I use one of their cover artists), and their bold advertising is showcased on author book pages. They currently have forty-seven authors on their website. As of today, seventeen of their books are in the top 100-best selling on Amazon. Some of the authors consistently on the best selling list, just to name a few are:
  • The Historical Romance Standards – There are plenty of authors who make the best selling list every once in a while, but some of the usual ones up on the Amazon list are the following. These authors currently have books ranking at the top. Julia Quinn has taken over the best selling list since the release of Bridgerton, and her books are still hoarding the top-ten for the series. Right now she as twelve books in the top 100. Showing up on the list too are Sarah MacLean and Lisa Kleypas with a few of their own novels.
  • Independent Authors – Anybody can write a book these days, and the best selling historical romance list is also full of independent authors who come and go regularly after new releases or special advertising. It’s a given fact that if anyone gets a BookBub advertisement approved (and subsequently pays and arm and a leg for one day), you’re assured of making the top 100 list. I’ve been there myself. Once up, the book will usually stay for a week or two, and then drop off when more advertised books vie for spots.

  • Small Press & Oldies but Goodies– Small publishing companies make up an occasional best seller list, and don’t forget Harlequin (since 1949) and Mills & Boon UK (1908), who have been around since before some of you were born.

  • Never-Ending Best Sellers – There are a few authors who enjoy life on the best seller list as if they’ve been granted the spot perpetually — that includes Diana Gabaldon and Amy Harmon. Diana has repeatedly said that Outlander (with its 36,567 reviews) is not historical romance. It crosses over to the list with its time-travel historical fiction with romantic elements, and is bound to stay on the best seller list while Outlander is on Starz and readers still want to fantasize. Amy Harmon’s What the Wind Knows has been on the best seller list since it’s release in March of 2019. Again, it’s historical fiction, time-traveling, story with romantic elements. Apparently, the wind isn’t strong enough to blow it off the list either with 13,056 reviews.

The Best Sellers in Historical Romance on Amazon is a fluid list that changes by the hour, literally. It’s updated hourly by Amazon based on sales and books at the bottom come and go, while others crawl their way to the top. Well-read authors and those with spot-on advertising make the best of the list, which is alive in itself. Once you make it up there, sales appear to feed upon themselves when readers see you’re in the top one-hundred. I have had my own glory days on the list too, basked in the top numbers, and then watched my books fall off into oblivion. It’s a jungle of competition, new releases, and author favorites.

Historical Romance, Press This

Christies -Up for Auction (Press This!)

 

If you have $30,000 to $50,000 laying around, time to run over to the auction website and bid on the first edition of Jane Austen’s Emma.  What a treasure!

First edition of Jane Austen’s first published novel, which grew from a sketch entitled Elinor and Marianne written in 1795 in epistolary form. It was substantially revised in 1797-1798 at Steventon and again in 1809-1810, the first year of Jane Austen’s residence at Chawton.

Source:  Christie’s

You can also pick up Northanger Abbey: and Persuasion, Jane Austen first editions, for an estimated USD 50,000 – USD 70,000

Historical Romance, Press This

Romance Writers of America Rescinds Award for Christian Novel as Publisher Defends It (Press This! The Washington Post)

It’s a hot topic but one I find difficult to swallow. Once again, we are back to silencing anything to do with the past, especially if it’s something we’d rather not talk about, acknowledge, or learn from actions. As defended by the publisher, I tend to agree with their assessment.

The question now comes to the surface, is Romance Writers of America going to punish authors who write historically correct romance novels, set during controversial events? Do they even dare to set this new course of action?

Complaints from a few readers or not via Twitter or elsewhere, the RWA is bowing to the pressure of a few rather than awarding someone for a well-written novel that tells truth.

Badly done, RWA. RWA gives; RWA takes away. I think I’ll order the book.

If you are unaware of this historical event, Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee is a must-read book and classic account.

The book opens with Hanger leading the U.S. Army’s 7 Cavalry as it confronts the Lakota Sioux at Wounded Knee, South Dakota, in a historical event now known as the Wounded Knee massacre.

Source: Romance Writers of America rescinds award for Christian novel as publisher defends it – The Washington Post

“In the opening scene of the novel, Witemeyer’s hero, a military officer, is at war with the Lakota, weary of war, but fully participating in the battle at Wounded Knee. The death toll, including noncombatant Lakota women and children, sickens him, and he identifies it as the massacre it is and begs God for forgiveness for what he’s done. The author makes it clear throughout the book that the protagonist deeply regrets his actions and spends the rest of his life trying to atone for the wrong that he did,” the statement said.

Source: Religion News

Articles, Historical Romance, Historical Romance Genre, Period Movies

The Psychology of Romance Novels or Period Dramas

There are plenty of articles on the Internet from psychology resources that state romance novels are bad for women. Some say these books give women unrealistic expectations when it comes to romance and can damage real-life relationships. Perhaps the psychologists think it’s mental porn for women, somewhat like the damage visual porn inflicts on the male species. There’s also another camp that says romance movies are bad for you as well. (Let’s all stick our heads in the sand so no fantasy touches our lives.) Here are a few for your reading enjoyment:

You Won’t Believe How Romance Novels Affect the Psychology of Women (“Leading psychologists are of the opinion that romantic novels can have a huge impact on the psychology of women; sometimes, making it unhealthy for relationships.”)

The Allure of Romance – Why do romance novels sell so well? (Psychology Today says, “And that reason could be that romance novels give women something they need, and do it in a way that the world around us cannot.”)

Are Romance Movies Bad for You? (“Researchers are beginning to ask whether the make-believe world projected in “rom-coms” might actually be preventing true love in real life.”)

In today’s world, there are many other avenues of fantasy that readers take besides romance novels. Readers whisk themselves away in sci-fi planetary adventures or magical make-believe realms with dragons. Are these psychologically damaging as well because it’s not reality? I dare say in this day and age, humans need to escape reality occasionally either in books or film. As we deal with climate change, pandemics, wars, racial strife, and the other ailments of the world, it makes sense to take our minds elsewhere. If we don’t take a step outside reality for a few minutes, we’d all end up in more psychologist’s chairs doing therapy.

Many women read historical romance – both married and unmarried. In fantasy they read their duke-centric historical romance, daydreaming about calling the hero “Your Grace” and being swept off their feet in the Regency era. When the bookmark is placed or the eReader turned off, they lift their eyes to see their husband in a tee-shirt and blue jeans and sigh. The question is does it affect their marriage or does the affection they hold in the world of reality remain? I’m laughing as I write this because, in all honesty, I think most women accept the reality of life but enjoy the soothing thoughts of something a bit different between the words of a romance novel.

On the other hand, there are plenty of unmarried women in no relationship whatsoever. Do historical romance books raise their expectations too high when looking for a man, or does it actually fill a need in their lives to fantasize about what it would be like to be loved. I dare say it fills a void.

In the end, anything we do can lead to unhealthy addictions, but psychologists declaring with certainty that romance novels or romance films are bad for our mental health is a bit of an overstatement. Mentally healthy women can grip reality and “not allow their real life’s happiness to hang in the balance over a fictional character.” ( I found this beautiful quote from someone in Facebook’s Sanditon group, attempting to bring calm to the masses who have lost their senses over Theo James not returning.)

Romantic stories have been around for centuries. Did anyone complain to Shakespeare that his story of Romeo and Juliet was contributing to the high number of suicides by star-crossed lovers? Were Jane Austen’s novels deemed unhealthy for women for the past two hundred years?

Chime in. Why do you read historical romance or enjoy period dramas in film or television? Escape? Relaxation? Daydreaming? Pure enjoyment? What deep psychological need does it fulfill in your life? As Jane Austen once said, “The person, be it a gentleman or lady, who has not pleasure in a good novel, must be intolerably stupid.”

Articles, Historical Romance

Sources for eBooks

Those of you who like the ability to read digital material rather than smelling the scent of the printed page, source your eBooks from a variety of sources. Authors and publishers make those eBooks available to readers on multiple platforms.

This week I have stumbled upon articles about libraries and how the demand for eBooks soared during the pandemic. The increase in demand has created challenges with libraries to continue to obtain the digital rights to those novels. READ HERE (Why 2021 Is Setting Up to Be a Pivotal Year for Digital Content in Libraries).

Authors and publishers distribute eBooks on a variety of platforms. As an independent author, my distributor Draft2Digital distributes my content to libraries through services such as Bibliotheca and Baker & Taylor. However, eBooks are also distributed to digital storefronts such as:

  • Amazon
  • Apple Books
  • Barnes & Noble
  • Kobo
  • Scribd
  • Tolino
  • OverDrive
  • BorrowBox
  • Hoopla
  • Vivlio
  • Others

Downloading those books depends on your digital readers like Kindle, Nook, and other generic electronic devices for PC’s, Mac, and phones.

Naturally, most people think that Amazon is the place where authors have their greatest success, which is probably true for some. However, anything you read as part of Kindle Unlimited on Amazon, you won’t find anywhere else such as Apple, Barnes & Noble, or libraries because of the exclusivity provisions placed upon authors. You can find the paper versions at retailers but not the eBook version. That it itself is a huge loss of content to readers who don’t look to Amazon for everything from eBooks to groceries.

I will admit I have two Kindles, but I find reading makes my eyes blurry. I thoroughly enjoy holding a printed book in my hand and smelling something tangible. Of course, the cost of digital readers eventually pays for itself when individuals can read books for free or 99 cents rather than paying $12.99 for a print copy of your next aristocratic love story.

Naturally, I’m slightly curious as to where you source your eBooks. Do you depend on library content or are you sourcing from retailers? If you’re a book sniffer, chime in too. We all have our addictions.

Historical Romance

Censored by Facebook

The matter of freedom of speech is under attack on social media platforms to such a ridiculous extent that I am going to use this forum to express my freedom of speech after being silenced on Facebook.

Recently, a guest post was added to my blog by Brita Addams titled, “A Woman’s Place in History.” It’s an excellent article that reviews the evolution of women’s rights and how authors approach that subject while penning historical romance books. It’s informative, well-written, and historically accurate.

To give this post greater visibility, I paid Facebook to boost the post. It was immediately rejected for the reason below.

Your ad may have been rejected because it mentions politicians or is about sensitive social issues that could influence public opinion, how people vote and may impact the outcome of an election or pending legislation. Our policy for running ads about social issue, electoral or politics requires you to get authorized first by confirming your identity and creating a disclaimer that lists who is paying for the ads.

Naturally, I thought it was a mistake. The article does contain the word “vote” in it, so I figured a bot just flagged it as controversial in content. I took the next step and asked for a manual review, and it came back again – rejected.

This level of censorship on Facebook has reached an all-time high when a page cannot post anything historical about the past that shines a light upon social issues. If you don’t think that this practice of censorship is dangerous, then you need a wake-up call. It’s downright outrageous, over-reaching, and threatens our freedom of speech at every level. In today’s society, we are being told how to think, speak, act, and write. The books you love to read may soon be banned or burned, if this is the avenue we are taking.

I am so overwhelmingly angry at Facebook that I could scream. If it wasn’t for the fact that my close family and friends are on the platform, I would shut my account down and walk away without a second thought. If this censorship continues, I might do so anyway.

Please take a moment to read the post and let me know what you think about Facebook’s ability to censorship history. A Woman’s Place in History by Brita Addams (Historical Tidbit!). If you wouldn’t mind, I would also appreciate comments on our Facebook Page in support of this post. https://www.facebook.com/historicalromancepromo

There isn’t too many things in life that ruffle my feathers, but this one really got my 21st-century panties in a bunch.

Historical Romance, Historical Tidbits

A Woman’s Place in History by Brita Addams (Historical Tidbit!)

A keen understanding of the evolution of women’s rights allows us to understand our female characters as they lived in their era. A misstep we sometimes take is viewing the past through today’s prism. We are much more enlightened than our ancestors, borne of accumulated experiences and the hard work done by the strong women who fought so we might, for instance, vote and enjoy the rights we have today.

Prior to the 19th century, laws strictly dictated a woman’s behavior, as well as their right to property. Ever gallant, men of the era protected the “delicate sensibilities” of the ladies in polite society by preventing them from the “vulgarities” of traveling in the funeral procession or attending funerals, even those for close family members. Reflecting on such a dictate makes one wonder if the women of the day balked at such a notion, especially as their closest relations passed on.  

In 1848, New York passed the Married Women’s Property Act which bolstered the rights of married women to own property. At last, women had the agency to conduct business on their own behalf, assume ownership of gifts they received, and file lawsuits. The 1860 Act Concerning the Rights and Liabilities of Husband and Wife acknowledged “mothers as joint guardians of their children.” This allowed married women the legal authority over their own sons and daughters. Can you imagine that such a law needed to be enacted?

Over time, other states emulated and improved upon New York’s laws, which proved a boon for women. By 1900, married women gained significant control over their property. The suffragette’s work culminated on August 18, 1920, when the right to vote gave women a voice in their own destinies. Women still needed their husband’s signature in all financial matters, until the 1970s, when they attained the right to have a credit card in their own name.

The patriarchal society of the past began to crumble as women sought their rightful place in all matters. What a shame it would be if we, as authors, forgot about the struggles of our long passed sisters, and portrayed them with 21st century attitudes and actions. As a writer of historical fiction, I feel compelled to depict my characters, male and female, as they existed in history.

Were there feisty, kick-ass women before the twentieth century? Of course. But overall, most women lived within the laws and expectations of their time. They also dealt with ideas of propriety, held dear by those elders still living. One need search no further than Lady Grantham of Downton Abbey to understand how dearly they held Victorian values. Remember, Lady Grantham is completely entrenched in the prior century. This exchange sums up this point:

Lady Mary: “I was only going to say that Sybil is entitled to her opinions.”
Lady Grantham: “No, she isn’t, until she is married. And then her husband will tell her what her opinions are.”

This encapsulates the attitudes so deeply ingrained in our ancestral sisters. Though laws slowly changed, the elders reinforced the subservient stance of women. As they passed on, a more youthful view took hold, but with a painfully slow transformation. I remember a great deal of male dominance in my childhood home in the 1960s. Father ruled the roost, Mother did as my father told her. Believe me, she had no choice, defiance wasn’t an option. Like other men of his time, he denied her authority over her children. I asked permission once to attend play practice at the high school, and she gave permission, as my father wasn’t home. When I got home, he grounded me, because I hadn’t called him, at work, to ask permission. “Asking your mother is equal to asking your brother.”

I remember the days when women lived this way, though certainly not as restricted as in the 19th century, but restricted nonetheless. I use those memories to construct female characters who, like my mother, are subjected to authoritarian rules, with one big difference. My father’s attitudes toward a woman’s place wasn’t based in law, but in his own upbringing. He emulated what he lived, as did most men throughout history.

As the elders aged and died, so did their antiquated ways. The prevailing attitudes caught up with the laws, and we are better for that.

I’ve heard the unflattering phrase, “too stupid to live” assigned to female characters in historical fiction and romance, who are portrayed as subjects of their father’s, brother’s, or husband’s dictates. They don’t, in any meaningful way, fight back, but accept their place as fact. As a writer, I find this phrase disheartening. These characters behave according to the customs, laws, and mores of their times. Yes, they eventually find comfortable circumstances, but they all are aware that they are the anomaly of their time.

Should we read historical fiction or historical romance, and expect that every female character has 21st century sensibilities? I say no. We either write true to the era, or we’ve simply created a costume drama, with little to associate it with reality.

As a reader, I want reality in character portrayal. That means a female character learns to live within expectations, and if she’s clever enough, she might learn to circumvent some of them. That reality didn’t make the women of the past stupid, and it certainly doesn’t make well-crafted characters stupid either. Realistic? Yes. Full of promise, yes. After all, women have molded men to their will for centuries. I want to believe that women inspired the changes in laws, after they convinced the men the idea was theirs.

Understanding the centuries-long struggle is essential to understanding true characterizations in historical fiction and romance. I remain firmly in the ‘portray women within the restrictions of their times’ camp. Otherwise, we’re simply creating 21st century women in costume.

About Brita Addams

Prompted by her love of history, writer of historical fiction and historical romance, Brita Addams has tromped around old cemeteries and dusty town hall basements for over twenty years as a non-professional genealogist. She’s uncovered some juicy stories about her ancestors that may or may not have already found their way into her writing. For several years, she lectured on genealogy aboard cruise ships, as part of their Enrichment Programs.

​Having grown up in blustery Upstate New York, Brita has lived in the sultry South for many years. She has a loving, supportive family, including her native New Orleanian husband, who makes killer gumbo and potato salad. After years in the Big Easy, she and her husband moved to the Frog Capital of the World (yes, that’s a thing,) to be closer to two of their three grown children.

She is Grammie to grandpuppy, Fiona, a maltipoo who has stolen her Grammie’s heart, as well as a treasured grandson and granddaughter. She never misses a chance to relate stories of the past to her grandchildren, as she celebrates life everyday, well aware of how fragile life is.  

On her website and blog, readers will find a complete listing of her works. http://britaaddams.net

Historical Romance, Press This

Why Did I Wait So Long to Read Jane Austen? (Press This! Literary Hub)

I came to Jane Austen late. As a lifelong reader, I do not have a simple explanation for this omission, but when my family decided to read Pride and Prejudice as a family reading project soon after the pandemic forced us into isolation, I jumped at the chance to fill in the gap in my literacy.

Source: Why Did I Wait So Long to Read Jane Austen? ‹ Literary Hub