Book Adaptations

The Frenzy Over Seeking Persephone

You cannot scroll through Facebook, Instagram, or X without seeing a post or video about Seeking Persephone. If you have not heard all the buzz, the series is based on the novel of the same name by Sarah M. Eden, first published in 2008 and republished by Shadow Mountain Publishing in 2026 with updated series covers. Reader reviews currently stand at 4.6 stars on Amazon and 4.1 on Goodreads.

Unlike many modern adaptations, this production was reportedly crowdfunded rather than developed through a traditional rights sale—where studios often acquire creative control and reshape stories as they see fit (think Bridgerton and Julia Quinn relinquishing creative rights over adaptation decisions).

So, what explains the excitement? Why are women swooning over this slow-burn romance? I have a few suspicions. But is the production truly as compelling as Regency-romance fans claim?

Having watched the series twice myself, I have a few observations—some praise, some criticism—regarding the production quality, casting choices, performances, and perhaps most interestingly, why this series appears to be succeeding despite some very noticeable flaws.

Casting and Acting

Let’s talk about casting and acting. For me, the casting felt somewhat uneven.

As far as the leads go, Ryann Bailey (Persephone) and Jake Stormoen (Adam) felt well suited to their roles. Ryann embodied Persephone beautifully, portraying her with warmth, kindness, and quiet understanding. Jake, while occasionally leaning a bit too heavily into Adam’s gruffness, captured the character’s restrained longing effectively, particularly in the quieter moments and lingering looks directed toward his wife.

Charlotte Hemmings, who portrays the Dowager mother, felt less convincing in the role. At 33 years old in real life, she appeared noticeably young for the character she was meant to portray, and at times that age gap between performer and role showed onscreen. By contrast, Will Kemp, portraying Persephone’s father, brought a more believable sense of maturity to his role.

Toby-Alexander Smith, who plays Harry, proved more challenging for me personally. Age-wise, he fit the role well enough, but aspects of the performance felt overly exaggerated, pulling me out of scenes rather than drawing me into them. Harry may very well have been written to irritate viewers, but the portrayal simply did not work for me.

As for the remainder of the supporting cast, whose appearances were relatively brief, I have little to comment on one way or another.

The Story

Well, if you’ve seen it, you know the story. If not, here’s the breakdown in a nutshell.

Adam is the Duke of Kielder and has no heir. A cousin he strongly dislikes stands next in line to inherit his estate. Rather than allow the title and property to pass to him, Adam is advised to take a wife and produce an heir. However, burdened by both emotional and physical scars, he has little interest in courting any of society’s eligible ladies.

Instead, a family with an unmarried eldest daughter is recommended to him, and Adam sends a proposal of marriage sight unseen.

After careful consideration—and encouraged by the rather substantial financial arrangement offered to her family—Persephone accepts. They arrive at the ceremony as strangers, exchange their vows, and depart for Adam’s imposing castle seemingly situated in the middle of nowhere.

A few awkward words are exchanged regarding Persephone’s “ridiculous” name—”ridiculous” being Adam’s favorite adjective—and then married life begins. She goes one direction; he goes the other. When the wedding night arrives, Adam makes no effort to consummate the marriage.

What follows is the familiar slow-burn trope: two guarded people learning to trust one another, building friendship, and eventually falling in love. There are a handful of restrained romantic moments—three or four kisses—but otherwise the story remains remarkably chaste to the point the marriage is never consummated during the series. Even when Persephone occasionally seeks comfort next to him in bed after being unsettled by wolves howling outside the castle walls, Adam remains steadfastly reserved. Nevertheless, their first kiss initiated by Adam is moving and tender, which leaves Persephone to proclaim in astonishment, “You do that very well.

One lingering question for me involved Harry. Adam constantly asks him, “Why are you still here?” As a viewer, I found myself wondering the same thing.

Harry often seemed to serve little purpose beyond acting as Adam’s companion and sounding board, which felt somewhat odd once Adam was married. At times, he came across like an unnecessary extra wheel in scenes where the focus naturally belonged on Adam and Persephone building their relationship. In one scene, Adam and Persephone tell Harry to “shut up.” I found myself saying that quite often through the series.

As Adam’s supposed closest friend, Harry clearly exists to offer encouragement, perspective, and occasional nudges toward emotional growth. Even so, I found the dynamic between the two men somewhat unusual, and at times his continued presence felt more distracting than essential to the story.

If there is a larger message beneath the Beauty and the Beast framework—and the repeated nods to Hades and Persephone from Greek mythology—it is that kindness, patience, and understanding have the power to heal another person’s wounds.

Persephone, though fragile in some ways, consistently meets Adam’s bitterness with compassion. Adam, meanwhile, insists he needs no one, which creates an interesting contradiction considering he requires a wife specifically to secure his legacy. Yet despite his resistance, he becomes exactly what Persephone needs: a protector, a source of safety, and eventually, something far more meaningful.

If anything succeeds most in this production, it is the tenderness that gradually develops between them. Viewers seem particularly drawn to Adam’s vulnerability—his longing glances, emotional restraint, and inability to articulate feelings he has never before allowed himself to experience.

Ultimately, I suspect that is why this series has taken over social media.

What woman cannot appreciate the fantasy? A brooding duke in a castle who desperately needs you, looks at you as though you hung the moon, and makes you his Duchess.

Fairy tales endure for a reason.

The Ridiculous

“Ridiculous” is Adam’s favorite word. He uses it to describe nearly everything he cannot understand or anything that does not fit neatly into his way of thinking. Perhaps that is my problem as well, because there were a few elements in the production that felt a bit ridiculous to me.

Wolves – Having written eighteen books myself, I can say from experience that readers can be merciless when authors fail to do their research.

A significant part of Persephone’s characterization revolves around her fear of wolves. She cries, shudders, and repeatedly expresses anxiety over their presence. There is only one problem: wolves did not roam Regency-era England.

The last recorded wild wolf in England is generally believed to have disappeared centuries earlier in 1340, long before the Regency period. Nor would hybrid wolf packs have been lurking in English forests waiting to pounce on unsuspecting travelers.

Even Adam acknowledges there “should not” be wolves, while simultaneously explaining his estate houses one of the last remaining packs. Most viewers will likely overlook this improbable detail because Persephone’s fear serves a narrative purpose. It gives Adam opportunities to protect her and reinforces the broader Beauty and the Beast atmosphere surrounding the story.

It reminded me somewhat of Kate Sharma’s fear of thunderstorms in Bridgerton. Dramatic? Certainly. Entirely realistic? Perhaps not. England experiences thunderstorms far less frequently than many places, averaging only a handful of storm days annually depending on the region.

I suppose we can chalk these moments up to creative liberties. Authors take them all the time. Some simply get away with them more easily than others.

Eating – Gosh, there was breakfast. Dinner. Trays sent to rooms. Plates piled with food.

Yet I do not believe I saw a single morsel actually eaten.

I found myself chuckling during one dinner scene as Persephone carefully cut food on her plate for what felt like an eternity while attempting conversation with Adam. Apparently, in Regency England, dining was less about eating and more about moving cutlery convincingly.

Payment – One element that stretched believability for me was the financial arrangement.

During the Regency era, a typical Duke’s annual income ranged from £30,000 to over £100,000, with the wealthiest (like the Dukes of Devonshire and Bedford) pulling in over £220,000. Even so, Adam offering Persephone’s family £100,000 struck me as unusually extravagant—especially given that the arrangement begins as a practical marriage proposal rather than a grand romantic gesture.

Perhaps Adam simply had very deep pockets, or perhaps “ridiculous” applies here too.

The Gibbet – Another peculiar aspect of the series involves the Duke’s response to the stable hand who endangered his wife’s life. After confronting the man and declaring himself “the law,” Adam threatens punishment by consigning him to the gibbet—a grim symbol of justice that hangs outside the castle as a constant reminder of consequences.

The moment feels oddly dramatic, particularly within the tone of the story established up to that point. More puzzling still, the resolution to Adam’s declaration never feels fully developed. Whether the punishment is carried out, intended merely as intimidation, or meant to reveal something deeper about Adam’s character is left somewhat unresolved, making the entire sequence feel a bit ridiculous rather than impactful.

I suppose, in the end, many viewers are willing to forgive these minor flaws because of what the series gets right. If you can separate the wheat from the chaff, this Regency-era romance trope is worth the watch.


Where to Watch

You can stream all four episodes of the Regency-era drama Seeking Persephone on Peacock TV or Passionflix. You can also buy or rent the series. It is available on Amazon Prime Video and Fandango at Home.

Articles, Historical Romance

Blood, Sweat & Tears – What it’s like to write a book.

I write this post from the lens of an independently published author. However, I’m sure it resonates with those who are traditionally published as well. As an avid reader of historical romance, you are on the finished side of creative work. Have you ever considered what it is like to be the creator of that story you hold? Here are some brutally honest thoughts on what it’s like to write a book, and why it consists of a lot of blood, sweat, and tears.

The Blood – The life of a book is in the blood. Authors create characters out of thin air and give them life. They’ve chosen their names, where they live, their personalities, their backgrounds, and the paths they will walk to find love. When an author pours their soul into any creative work, they bleed. A part of them becomes imprinted on the page. Woven into the creation are their thoughts, struggles, and life experiences that are hidden between chapters and in the prose.

Once created, it’s released to the public. Authors tend to bleed when a reviewer writes a snide or hateful review. Whether the work is a Nobel Prize-worthy piece of literature or a run-of-the-mill self-published Kindle creation, authors are very attached to their stories regardless of the love and hate they may receive from readers. As a result, every book produces some drops of blood during and after the creative process. Even popular authors bleed. Here is a good quote:

“There is nothing to writing. All you do is sit down at a typewriter and bleed.”

Ernest Hemingway

The Sweat – It’s the hours writing. It’s the voices in an author’s head demanding to be heard. It’s the plotting. It’s the point of view. It’s the tense. It’s the overused words. It’s the dialogue. It’s the punctuation. It’s those grammar classes we never paid attention to in grade school coming back to bite us. It’s the hours of research, and finally, those damn typos that never seem to go away. Frankly, it’s hard work. You bleed and sweat, and your reward for the hours you took to create a story is a 35 cent royalty from a 99 cent priced book.

After a writer finishes writing and editing, there is plenty of work before release. It’s the formatting, the cover art, the copyright registration, the Library of Congress, the ISBN assignment, and working with distributors. After release, comes the expense and sweat of marketing. On top of that, you sweat worrying what people will think about it and hope you don’t have to bleed too much when the comments start rolling in. Writing a book can be stinky business as this author states:

“Sometimes the ideas just come to me. Other times I have to sweat and almost bleed to make ideas come. It’s a mysterious process, but I hope I never find out exactly how it works.”

J. K. Rowling

The Tears – Tears can arrive for many reasons when writing a book. They could be author tears of self-doubt. Authors are not all confident arrogant individuals. Remember this quote from the Oscars in 2014? No wonder we cry.

The mind of a writer can be a truly terrifying thing. Isolated, neurotic, caffeine-addled, crippled by procrastination, consumed by feelings of panic, self-loathing, and soul-crushing inadequacy. And that’s on a good day.”

Robert De Niro

The tears also arrive because authors are emotionally involved in their characters and story. Sometimes their character’s journey reminds them of their own hurt inside, and they cry while writing. At other moments, it raises empathy for the plight of others having to live the situations we create on paper. Emotional involvement in characters is an inevitable part of being an author. Without it, characters are dry and lifeless. Consider this quote:

“No tears in the writer, no tears in the reader.”

Robert Frost

Then there are tears of release when an author holds the printed book and flips through the pages. They feel a sense of pride and accomplishment in what they have created. Authors also cry when people trash their work, and shed tears of joy when people praise their stories.

Is the blood, sweat, and tears worth it all? Yes.

I first knew I wanted to write in grade school. It’s been ingrained in my brain, imprinted on my soul, and a driving force behind my fingers. It’s foolish for me to think that I’m terrific at my craft because I’m not. I’m an average Jane out in the world of thousands of books released each year. I’m continually learning how to write better. Sometimes I want to quit, but I’m afflicted, as this quote declares:

“I think all writing is a disease. You can’t stop it.”

William Carlos Williams

So the next time you pick up your Kindle or a paperback, remember you are not holding a new historical romance book — you are holding the blood, sweat, and tears of an individual who wrote the story.

In conclusion, I’ll leave you with one of my favorite quotes about writing as explained by Winston Churchill.

“Writing a book is an adventure. To begin with it is a toy then an amusement. Then it becomes a mistress, and then it becomes a master, and then it becomes a tyrant and, in the last stage, just as you are about to be reconciled to your servitude, you kill the monster and fling him to the public.”